Governments from around the world have pledged to work together to test new AI models before they’re unleashed on the public. How will they do that? That’s far from clear.
The UK government issued a statement following this week’s AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park, stating that “governments” had reached “a shared ambition to invest in public sector capacity for testing and other safety research”. The statement didn’t specify which governments had reached this accord, although the statement distinguishes the agreement on AI testing from the broader Bletchley Declaration, which was agreed by all 27 attending governments and the EU.
The FT reports that the UK, USA and Singapore will be among the countries involved in testing AI, and that companies including ChatGPT creator OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Amazon and Microsoft are among the firms that will submit their products for testing.
“Until now the only people testing the safety of new AI models have been the very companies developing it,” said UK prime minister Rishi Sunak in a statement. “We shouldnโt rely on them to mark their own homework, as many of them agree.
“Today weโve reached a historic agreement, with governments and AI companies working together to test the safety of their models before and after they are released.”
Testing AI models
It’s not yet clear how the UK government or its international counterparts will find or fund the capacity required to test AI models, particularly if validation is required before these models are released.
Take OpenAI’s GPT model, for example. It has released five major versions in five years, and that’s only one of the many companies now ploughing billions into AI developments. It would need enormously well-resourced testing teams to keep up with the pace of innovation. And there are countless AI projects being developed by companies who aren’t subject to the agreement.
And there’s another problem: the agreement isn’t legally binding. That means AI firms won’t face any punishment if they push products out without government approval.
Sunak himself has admitted that developing legislation to force companies to submit products for testing could take many years.
In the meantime, the US and UK are pressing ahead with plans to develop AI Safety Institutes, while the EU is progressing with its own plans. Will they be able to put the safety brakes on the rapid evolution of AI or is it mere posturing? We’ll only find out in a few years’ time.
Barry has 25 years of experience working on national newspapers, websites and magazines. He was editor of PC Pro and is co-editor and co-owner of BigTechQuestion.com. He has published a number of articles on TechFinitive covering data, innovation and cybersecurity.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.