Google last week unveiled its โbiggest upgradeโ to its search tool since the company first hit the web. It’s needed. So let’s hope it fixes Googleโs flaws rather than worsens them.
Here’s what the biggest upgrade involves narrowed down to three headline items:
- Building Google Gemini directly into the search box
- Integrating AI agents into search to work in the background on long-running projects
- Expanding search into Gmail and Google Photos, with user permission
That may not sound like much, but itโs shifting what search means. It will place users at the centre of each search by using their own data to personalise results. Not an entirely new idea for Google, of course. What is new is that it will personalise the results using AI.
โThe goal of Search has always been simple: to help you ask anything on your mind โ from quick facts to the deep, complex or hyper-specific questions that can be hard to articulate,โ said Elizabeth Reid, VP of Search at Google. โTo make this possible, weโve continued to reimagine what Search can do with AI.โ
If that all works, itโll be splendid. After all, Googleโs search has been less good of late, which is probably due to spam sites filling the web with well-optimised garbage. Anything that keeps Search working is good news for those still attempting to use the web for information.
It would also be good news for Google, which makes more than half of its revenue from Search. Just look at Google-owner Alphabetโs annual revenue of $402.8bn last year: the โSearch & Otherโ division made up 55.7% of that total. A cool $224.5bn.ย
So Google doesnโt want us to all start getting our digital info from ChatGPT, DuckDuckGo, Ecosia or Startpage. But, despite having access to some of the best minds in AI, Googleโs first round of search results using AI left plenty to be desired.
Google AI Overviews… what a palaver
As noted by The Verge, Googleโs AI Overview immediately started returning odd results. For instance, it misinterpreted searches for the word โdisregardโ as an instruction to stop doing something. Similar issues were spotted with โignoreโ and โskip”.
My own attempt to doublecheck the meaning of the phrase โwithout all the palaverโ โ itโs a funny phrase, okay โ led to a generative chat style response.
โIt looks like you want to skip the lengthy explanations and get straight to the point,โ AI Overview said. โPlease let me know what you are looking for โ such as local restaurants, events, travel details, or quick answers โ and I will provide a brief, direct response without fuss.โ
Ironically, that actually did answer my question, but in a roundabout way. However, I was looking for a dictionary definition, such as that returned by the top traditional search result. A week later, I ran that search again: AI Overview is still acting like a chatbot rather than returning information.
A Google spokesperson told Android Authority that the search giant was aware AI Overviews was โmisinterpreting some action-related queriesโ with a solution due soon.
AI not the answer to every problem
Thatโs one problem with AI Overview but there are others. One study suggested AI Overview failed to back up its claims via accurate citations 11% of the time.
All of that raises a wider question: if it doesnโt work all that well (yet or ever), should Google be cramming AI into search? On one hand, it would be increasingly difficult to buy into Googleโs continued statements on the world-changing promise of AI if it didnโt dogfood the tech itself.
On the other hand, the whole point of Googleโs Search, per its own motto, is โto organize the worldโs information and make it universally accessible and usefulโ. If AI, be it in the backend or in AI Overviews, doesnโt help Google achieve that, then whatโs the point?
Of course, Google infamously ditched one of its other mottos โ Donโt Be Evil, which should be a low bar to reach to be honest โ so perhaps we shouldnโt be surprised that Search is no longer about search but instead a marketing tool for generative AI.
AI Overview isn’t much use to the hype machine when it canโt return a sensible result when faced with a verb. But at least the results underneath the chatbot remain useful โ for the time being, at least โ showing thereโs more ways to organise information to be โuniversally accessible and usefulโ than just AI.
Thatโs something many should remember right now.
More articles by Nicole Kobie