Hitting a moving target: Can piracy be completely eradicated?

This article is part of our Opinions section, where we invite industry professionals to share their views on the most pressing technology questions of our time.

Minutes into a live stream, the stakes are high for operators. During peak traffic, pirated streams are already using an operator’s valuable CDN capacity to distribute their premium content free of charge. Operators then face a conundrum of which threats to disrupt. Why can’t all illicit activities be stopped?

The misconception that piracy stems from inaction fails to recognise its systemic and cross-border nature. The industry widely recognises that without basic anti-piracy protections, revenue and content value would be jeopardised. For operators, managing piracy means controlling leakage to preserve the return on investment from rights fees.

At the same time, it is worth saying that total piracy elimination is unrealistic; that goal would distract from more effective strategies to confront the moving target. Anti-piracy efforts should be less of a moral crusade and instead more of a disciplined approach to risk and resource allocation.

The paradox of universal enforcement 

Piracy persists because digital content is infinitely replicable. Once distributed, it can be copied and transmitted at a near zero-marginal cost. Coupled with the decentralised architecture of the internet, this enables piracy operations to span across borders. A single pirated service may be hosted in one country, registered in another, streamed through infrastructure in a third, and monetised through international advertising or payment networks. Concurrently, intellectual property enforcement remains largely jurisdiction-bound. Capacity and priorities vary significantly between countries, as some markets invest heavily in protection, and others allocate fewer resources. 

Even though piracy transcends national borders, coordinated international efforts are bridging the gaps. Interpol’s collaboration with local law enforcement shows how effective extending reach and intelligence sharing can be. International collaboration is often needed due to piracy’s global influence, as one government agency or country cannot handle elaborate piracy schemes on their own.

However, dismantling sophisticated piracy operations can be a time-intensive process. Building evidence for such an investigation requires the coordination of industry and law enforcement agencies at local and international levels. By the time operations can be terminated, pirates often have already changed their tactics or moved to new platforms. This is not to diminish the value of coordinated enforcement, but it is important to note the need for complementary strategies and more preemptive measures in parallel. 

Balancing protection and experience

Eliminating piracy through hyper-strict content controls may seem like the obvious solution, but this can have the opposite effect. For example, while DRM is a necessary component of anti-piracy, overly restrictive implementation can constrain flexibility for legitimate users, potentially reducing the perceived value of the legal service and even inadvertently pushing users towards piracy. This inherently creates a trade-off of protecting content without undermining the user’s experience.

The challenge, therefore, is not absolute restriction, but a balance. Streaming providers must protect high-value content without introducing friction for legitimate viewers. This balance has already been achieved through technologies designed to operate without disrupting the user experience. For example, modern forensic watermarking is both invisible and highly resilient, enabling illegal streams to be traced back even with lossy feedback channels, and without affecting the playback quality.

Instead, the mindset should be to dismantle the conditions that allow illegal streaming to thrive. This means disrupting the economics of piracy by increasing operational risk and cost. Through a combination of enforcement actions and targeted anti-piracy measures, providers can challenge the near-zero cost structure that enables these operations.

A multi-layered approach

Piracy will endlessly adapt, which is why constructive protection calls for a pragmatic and proactive approach. Doing so would entail a layered anti-piracy strategy, which ensures that operators can stay ahead and reduce risk. Investing in DRM, watermarking, and targeted enforcement is a vital pillar for resilience. No single measure can address all risks, as each pillar serves a distinct role while also reinforcing the effectiveness of the others.

Operators that embrace a multi-pronged, continuous approach are better positioned to preserve the value of content and maintain the trust of rights holders and audiences alike. While piracy may never be fully eradicated, ongoing investment in anti-piracy is essential to sustaining the economics of digital entertainment. Given this, it is better to plan and prepare for future risks instead of only staying reactive. 

More from the same author

• When seeing is no longer believing
• The new reality of streaming security: Why our living rooms are becoming the next big target
• Piracy as a commercial rival: coordinated strategies to protect sports streaming